Friday, 24 October 2014

Barska X-Trail 15x70 Binoculars - A Quick Review

Like all self-respecting amateur astronomers, I have a bad case of “Aperture Fever” - you never have enough aperture, and you can certainly never have too much!

I've been using my Pentax XCF 10x50 binoculars for stargazing for the past few months, and I'm still very happy with them - they deliver a lovely bright, sharp, wide-angle image. But I wanted more …

As is my habit, I started browsing eBay and other online shopping sites for something affordable in the 15x70 “giant” class, and I kept coming across the Barska X-Trail 15x70s 

The key specs are as follows:

  • Magnification: 15x
  • Objective Lens: 70 mm
  • Prism type: Porro, BAK-4
  • Exit Pupil: 4.7 mm (70 mm / 15x)
  • Optical Coating: Fully Coated
  • Field of View: 77 m @ 1000 m (4.4 degrees Actual FoV; 65 degrees Apparent FoV)
  • Close Focus: 15 m
  • Eye Relief: 20 mm
  • Weight: 1270 g
  • Included Accessories: Mini Table-Top Tripod, Tripod Adaptor, Soft Carrying Case, Neck Strap, Lens Covers and Lens Cloth

They ticked pretty well all of the boxes for me. About the only thing I could criticize is that they are only “Fully Coated” rather than “Fully Multi-Coated” - but for the low asking price, I figured I could live with this “omission”.

Plus of course, there's the open question of build and optical quality … They seemed to get good reviews overall, and they are certainly affordable, so there was only one way to find out….

I found an international seller who offered them for AU$94.95, including expedited delivery to Australia, so I took the plunge and ordered a pair on Thursday last week - and they were delivered in Brisbane exactly one week later - very happy with that!

The binoculars came very well packed, and arrived without any damage. I unpacked them and took a look at what I had bought.

The binoculars themselves feel solidly built and have a nice “heft” and balance. The fold-down cup on the right eyepiece is a bit "buckled" (I guess it has been "crushed" in the box for some time) - I'm not sure if it will straighten out over time, but it doesn't detract form the use of the binoculars. Apart from that, no problems at all.

The table-top tripod and tripod adapter are somewhat surprisingly not complete rubbish - the tripod is metal and seems quite sturdy,  but I'm not sure how often I will have a table to set them up on, and in any case, you can really only use them near-horizontal on such a small tripod, so it is really only useful for terrestrial viewing.

The carry case and neck strap are pretty basic (the neck strap is really WAY too thin for hanging these babies around your neck!), so an upgrade to a better wider padded strap is on the cards. The case is thin and soft, with minimal padding, so won't provide much protection from bumps and knocks, but my binoculars will live safely at home, and the case is really only going to be  a dust cover, so I can live with that.

I was pleased to find they were perfectly collimated, and provide a bright, sharp image all the way to the edge of the 65-degree apparent field of view (4.4-degrees actual field of view at 15x magnification).

There’s a bit of distortion and Chromatic Aberration at the edge of the field of view, if you look hard, but because these have a nice wide field of view, it really doesn't detract from the overall view. The distortion is there, but you can only really see it if you position a straight line (such as a building or power pole) near the edge of the field of view; it’s basically not noticeable on more “natural” targets. The CA is only apparent on bright, high-contrast targets near the edge of the field of view. These defects are only apparent if you switch your gaze from the centre to the periphery, and the effect disappears if you swing the binoculars to bring the main target more central.

But of course it was really their night-time use that I really wanted to test out!

When the Sun had set, and family duties had been attended to, I settled down in a camping chair in the back yard with my Pentax 10x50s, my new Barska 15x70s, and a couple of tripods. It’s New Moon at the moment, so checking out the Moon is out of the question for a few days, so my first targets were some old favourites that were favourably positioned - the globular cluster 47 Tucanae (NGC 104), the Great Nebula in Orion (M42), Andromeda Galaxy (M31), and Ptolemy’s Cluster (M7). I swapped back and forth between the two binoculars a few times on each target, to compare the views. 

And I was very impressed!

Stars were shown as pin-sharp points of light across the field - the CA and distortion that could be picked up by selecting suitable “test targets” in daylight really isn't apparent at all for stargazing use. (I suspect it will be more apparent on a bright target like the Moon, but again, should only be noticeable at the periphery rather than in the central view.)

The 15x70s show significantly more stars than the 10x50s, and the higher magnification tends to darken the background sky as well, which also helps in seeing very faint stars, and brings diffuse targets such as nebulae and galaxies into better contrast against the sky. Looking at nebulae and galaxies revealed a bigger apparent area (as the fainter edges could be resolved more clearly), and showed more detail and "structure" within the “body” of the nebulae as well - and all at 50% higher magnification than the 10x50s. The 4.4 degree field of view is ample for viewing pretty well any night-sky target, apart perhaps from seeing an entire constellation in a single view, for which the 10x50s with their 6.5 degree field might be preferable.

The 10x50s are light and compact enough to be held steady for extended periods, but the bigger  and heavier 15x70s definitely test your endurance after a short period. My tripods just aren’t the right size and shape for convenient binocular stargazing use while sitting in a  comfortable chair (you really need a parallelogram arm for this), and of course the higher magnification amplifies the shakes. However, I found that folding up the legs of a tripod to make a monopod worked very well (especially with the pan / tilt head) - just plant the base of the “monopod” on the ground ahead of you, and lean it back to bring the binoculars up to your face, and use the pan / tilt to get the alignment just right; then lock the pan / tilt, and you have a nice steady platform which requires virtually no arm support other than a bit of light guiding.

While playing around, I also found that the supplied table-top tripod also makes a handy “pistol grip” mount, which allows you to hand-hold the binoculars much more steady than conventional hand-held use. I folded the three legs together to make a single “grip” for my left hand, and turned the pan / tilt handle 90 degrees to the right (rather than it's normal orientation in-line with the binoculars); then holding the pan / tilt handle in my right, it is actually possible to hold the binoculars much more steadily and comfortably than the normal handheld position. I'm not sure why this is - it’s probably because your arms are comfortably resting down on your chest rather than being held elbows-out in front of your chest, but if you doubt me, try it - it might work for you too!

All in all, I’m very happy with my purchase! My only quibble is that I now have even more equipment to cart around - the 10x50s give a wonderful wide view for hand-held terrestrial and “wide sky” use (e.g. meteor spotting), and are light enough to throw in a backpack, but the 15x70s will be my “go to” binoculars for stargazing use, especially when I have a chair and a “monopod” to make them comfortable to use for extended viewing sessions.

Tuesday, 21 October 2014

Have you ever wanted to know what that bright light was that you just saw whizzing past overhead?

While it COULD have been a UFO or a meteorite, if it was evening (or pre-dawn), and it didn't look like an aeroplane, then there's a good chance that it was a satellite of some sort.

"Heavens Above" is a great resource for finding out what that thing was, or for getting notifications in advance of upcoming visible spacecraft fly-overs.

In particular, keep a look-out for the International Space Station and the "Iridium Flashes" in your neighbourhood - these can be VERY bright!

There is now also a "prototype" version of "Heavens Above" which is designed specifically for Mobile Devices - access it from your phone or tablet here:

Now there's no longer any need to print out your satellite-pass charts and tables before heading outside for a spot of spacecraft-spotting - just take your phone / tablet with you, and get real-time tables and charts on demand.

The main features are as follows:

  • "Live sky" chart will show you all the current visible satellites as they move across the sky. This is probably the most convenient display for an evening's viewing, as no navigation between pages is necessary.
  • Predictions include all visible satellites up to a configured magnitude cutoff, plus Iridium flares.
  • Javascript automatically refreshes the predictions when necessary and stores them locally on your device. Once you have downloaded the data for the next 24 hours, an Internet connection is no longer necessary.
  • Sky charts are generated on the client using Javascript.
  • Location can be obtained from the phone itself using the HTML5 geolocation service.
  • The site is implemented as a single HTML file and so transitions between pages do not require fetching data from the server.
  • Runs on any device with an HTML5 capable browser (most modern Android and iOS devices).
  • Makes use of the jQuery Mobile framework for a consistent "look and feel".
  • Pages are currently optimised for the smart phone format, but can also be used on tablets. A tablet-optimised layout will be available shortly.
  • The first version of the prototype is only available in the English language, but other languages will follow.

Very neat!

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

M6 "Butterfly Cluster" shot with ZWO ASI120MC on Celestron 130 mm Netwonian

This is the M6 "Butterfly Cluster" :

This is a 5-second exposure taken last night (14 October) with my ZWO ASI120MC astro-camera mounted on my 130 mm Newtonian telescope. The field of view is about 30 arc-minutes x 20 arc-minutes. (That is, the full Moon would just about fit in the long dimension of the image, but would more than cover the short dimension.)

The brightest star is V862 Scorpii at magnitude 6.76 (the slightly yellowish white star just below the centre of the image). The faintest visible stars are about Magnitude 11.5 - not bad for a 5 second exposure! The colours are all pretty accurate, when I compare with standard planetarium software.

Here is a B&W negative image, which can make it easier to pick out the fine detail:

One nice thing about shooting stars digitally (rather than on film as in the “bad old days”): 
For any given set of exposure settings, on a digital image there is a really nice linear relationship between the diameter of the star image and the apparent magnitude of the star. (When shooting time exposures on film, the relationship between the image diameter and the actual brightness of the star is much more complex.) This graph shows the relationship for a selected sample of stars on this particular image (bearing in mind I was only measuring the apparent diameters to about 0.5 mm accuracy when printed at A3 size). 

This means that with a few stars of known magnitude in frame, you can estimate the magnitude of all the other stars. I'll have to try this on a few variable stars and see if I can measure their variability, and do some “real science”!

Free Astronomy courses on Coursera - highly recommended!

Rutgers University is offering the 6-week "Analyzing the Universe" course free on Coursera, and it has just kicked off today:
This one looks like it is fairly analytical, but shouldn't be impossible if you remember a bit of your high school physics and maths.

For people who are looking for something at a bit more "introductory" level, the highly-regarded Duke University "Introduction to Astronomy" course is starting again on December 1 2014, and is open for enrolments on Coursera now:

Earlier this year, I did the "AstroTech" course offered by Edinburgh University, which was a really good introduction to the technology used by modern astronomers - this one had a pretty light "theory" load, so would suit amateur astronomers with any level of formal science / maths education.

For something which was a lot more challenging, but absolutely fascinating, take a look at "The Science of the Solar System", presented by "Pluto Killer" Mike Brown of CalTech.

If you're not familiar with Coursera, don't be afraid to take a look and enrol. There is a huge variety of courses being offered by universities all over the world, and it's all free. (Some courses give you the option of signing up to earn a formal certificate for a modest fee, but I haven't bothered with this, as I am doing these courses purely for my own self-education, not for any formal recognition.)

Wednesday, 8 October 2014

First shots of the Moon with ZWO ASI120MC

Enough tinkering with the hardware and cooling, etc - it's time to take some pictures!

North Polar region, taken on 2 October 2014 with 130 mm Newtonian (FL = 650 mm):

South Polar region, taken on 2 October 2014 with 130 mm Newtonian (FL = 650 mm):

And a rough composite of the above two images:

Tycho crater and rays (in the South polar region), taken on 6 October 2014 with 90 mm Maksutov (FL = 1200 mm):

Saturday, 4 October 2014

The benefits of fan cooling on a CPU-cooler / TEC

I've been playing with my Peltier TEC cooler mounted on my ZWO ASI120MC astro-camera:

Even though my CPU cooler came with a fan, I was hoping to get away with running it without a fan to avoid vibrations etc. However, even though I've been running the TEC at only 6 volts, I've noticed that sometimes the camera sensor temperature will stabilize at a Delta-T of about 12 degrees Celsius below ambient, but will sometimes then climb back again almost to ambient after a while, especially in warmer ambient air.

What I suspect is happening is this:

As long as the top radiator stays cool enough to re-condense the fluid in the Heat Tubes, it can pump heat away from the hot side of the TEC, and everything works nicely. However, if the top radiator gets too hot to allow the fluid to condense effectively, the Heat Tubes lose their ability to pump the heat efficiently, and the whole CPU Cooler assembly gets quite hot, and the TEC starts to heat up again, including the cold side.

It looks like my CPU cooler without a fan can pump the heat from the TEC running at 6 volts effectively as a passive device (no fan), with ambient temperatures of up to about 24 Celsius or so, maintaining a Delta-T on the camera sensor of around 10 to 12 degrees. However, at a certain critical heat load and / or critical ambient temperature, the fan-less CPU cooler can no longer shift the heat without the cold side of the TEC warming up again.

Since we are quickly approaching summer in Brisbane, and evening temperatures can stay at 24 degrees or more, I need to do something to maintain effective cooling - so I thought I'd put the fan on and see what happens:

The fan is rated at 12 volts, but since I'm running my TEC at only 6 volts, I thought I'd run the fan at 6 volts as well.

And the results?


The fan runs more slowly than it does at 12 volts (no surprise there!), but importantly, it runs silently, and apparently free of vibrations (which is good!)

Secondly, the top radiator and copper heat pipes go from feeling warm-to-hot without a fan, to feeling quite cool to the touch - barely warmer than ambient -so the fan forcing is REALLY helping!

And with ambient temperature of 28 degrees, the camera temperature sensor dropped quickly from around 15 degrees (which was about the best I could do without a fan) down to just 2 degrees Celsius - and it stays there! That's a Delta-T of 24 degrees Celsius, compared to a (sometimes-unstable) 10 to 12 degrees that I was getting before!

I'll definitely be trying the fan-forced cooler outside next chance I get!

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

Peltier TEC Cooler for ZWO ASI120MC Camera

I bought myself a Peltier Thermo-Electric Cooler (TEC) to have a go at cooling my ZWO ASI120MC telescope camera, to see how it goes at reducing image “noise”, especially for longer time exposures. These things are as cheap as chips (literally!) - I got mine for AU$1.91 on eBay, including postage!

Specifically, the unit I bought is a 12V 60W TEC1-12706 - you can find the datasheet here:  The datasheet suggests it could theoretically reach a Delta-T of about 40 deg C at 6 volts, or close to 70 deg C at 12 volts. I wouldn't expect my results to be THAT good, because I am sure that would only be possible with optimum installation etc; however, if I can set up a heat sink that can keep the hot side to around 40 to 50 deg C, I am hoping to get down to at around 20 deg C below ambient, meaning 0 deg C (or maybe even single-digit negatives?) at the sensor for a night-time imaging session outside. (I'm in Brisbane, Australia - it's a very rare night that ambient temperatures in the evening are in the single digits!)

I'm hoping to make do without needing a cooling fan (because of the likely vibrations that a fan will introduce). I was hoping to use the TEC with a conventional "passive" aluminium heat-sink with protruding "pins" like this:

I was hoping that with good heat conduction from the hot side of the TEC straight to the heat-sink, this would allow sufficient heat exchange to achieve satisfactory cooling without needing a fan to shed the heat load. However, early trials with a heat-sink and the TEC running at only 6 volts showed this wasn't going to work - the heat-sink got VERY hot to touch (maybe 70 to 80 degrees Celsius, at a guess?), and the camera sensor on the cold side of the TEC only registered a temperature drop of a couple of degrees C below ambient. Clearly, I need something with a LOT more heat-moving capability to get the heat away from the hot side of the TEC.

So I found myself a cheap CPU cooler with “Heat Pipes”. These things are very clever, using a combination of thermal conductivity and "phase change" (boiling / condensation of a fluid) to achieve a high degree of heat transfer, without any moving parts:

This unit comes with a fan, but I thought I’d have a go at installing it as a passive device first, and fit the fan only if I need to.

So I disassembled the fan from the CPU Cooler, and mounted it and the TEC onto the back of the camera body, using silicone thermal pads to get a decent conductivity path between the elements. (I’ll probably use more efficient thermal grease for the final assembly, but the silicone pads are nice and clean for trial assembly / disassembly / modification.)

For now, I have held the whole assembly together using 2 M4 screws, and a bit of wire to pull the whole lot into a rigid assembly with good contact between the elements - I will probably rig up a more solid clamping mechanism for the final build. Then I wrapped the camera body in a cut-off stubby cooler (or “Koozie” as I think they are known in the USA) to provide insulation to minimise the amount of stray heat leaking into the camera body.

Time for a test-bed run!

I hooked the camera up to my laptop, and used FireCapture to read the image signal and sensor temperature. I set the exposure to 30 seconds, with Gain pushed right up to 90%, to generate as much image “noise” as possible. (I probably wouldn't use these settings for actual image capture, but I wanted to see how much image noise this sensor-cooling set-up can suppress.)

FireCapture reported the sensor temperature was about 28 Celsius (this is indoors in Brisbane on a spring evening, remember!)

I then hooked the TEC up to a 6 volt SLA battery running through a multimeter to measure the amps. The meter showed the TEC was pulling about 1.5 amps initially, but straight away, the sensor temperature started to drop, and as it fell, the amperage also dropped off a little bit as well. 

The bank of cooling fins on the top of the device were getting warm to touch, but not hot - I would guess around 30 to 35 degrees Celsius or so. The finned block of aluminium at the base of the heat pipes, which is in contact with the hot side of the TEC was even warmer, but not burning hot to touch - I would guess about 50 degrees or so. The camera body that I could feel at the bottom end of the insulation "skin" was getting very cold to the touch (but not freezing cold). 

Now I know how Dr Frankenstein felt: "It's alive!"

After about 5 minutes, the sensor had stabilised at about 14 degrees Celsius, and the meter was showing about 1.3 amps. 

Not bad - I had achieved a Delta-T of around 12 to 14 degrees Celsius on my first attempt!

But does it work?


Here's a sample "dark frame" showing the image noise with the sensor at ambient of about 26 degrees Celsius, with a 30-second exposure with 90% Gain:  

And here's a sample of the image noise when the sensor had dropped to around 14 degrees Celsius, using the same 30-second exposure / 90% Gain - the noise level is certainly much better.

(Toggle back and forth between the two images to see the difference more clearly.) 

Both images are straight off the camera as captured in FireCapture, with no “Dark Frame” suppression, and no post-processing of any kind. For actual imaging, I would cool the camera first, then take a Dark Frame in FireCapture to suppress the noise before capturing any images - thereby giving a significant improvement over the ”raw” image sensor data.

Further experiments and results to follow.

I was thinking I might need to use a silica sachet to control dewing on the IR-cut filter - maybe even two, one inside and one outside the IR-cut filter in front of the sensor? Time will tell whether dewing is a problem for me ...

I'm hoping performance is satisfactory with the TEC running at 6 volts, which should mean I can run both the TEC and the scope for several hours.I might also see what it will do running at a full 12 volts. (Theoretically, it should achieve a significantly better Delta-T, and therefore a significantly lower temperature at the sensor, when running at 12 volts.) I might need a bigger battery if I want to run as 12 volts, though - the TEC could pull about 3 to 5 amps at 12 volts, so my 7.2 A-hr battery could be exhausted in an hour or two when powering both the TEC and the telescope mount.  

If I need to run at 12 volts to get adequate cooling, I guess I'll buy one of those car jump-starter battery packs - so much for this being a cheap hack!

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

47 Tucanae again - some better images

I have had another go at shooting 47 Tucanae, now that I have a better idea of exposure settings, etc. 

The following images are shot on my ZWO ASI120MC camera mounted on my 130 mm aperture Newtonian (650 mm focal length), with Sensor Gain set to 50%, to avoid "overloading" the sensor, with exposures of 5, 10, 20 and 30 seconds respectively. 

They're not perfect, but I'm pretty happy with how it's coming along! My focus is much better this time, and you can see a little bit of colour too.


Now THIS is convergence: The PiKon - 3D Printing an astronomical telescope using a Raspberry Pi camera sensor!

A team at the University of Sheffield have 3D-printed an astronomical telescope (based on the Newtonian design), which is equipped with a digital camera and Raspberry Pi controller:

All of my hobbies rolled up in to one - how cool is that?!

Read about it here:

Thursday, 18 September 2014

First Star Shots with ZWO ASI120MC camera

So, having had a bit of a play with some night-time all-sky imaging and daytime terrestrial targets, I finally had some reasonably clear skies last night (well, barely reasonable - it was hazy, with about 50% cloud cover), but I thought I'd see what my ZWO ASI120MC camera can do. By the time I got set up, there weren't any planets in the sky visible from my garden, and the Moon hadn't risen, so even though this is mainly a planetary camera, I thought I'd see what it could do with an easy DSO target.

I set up my Celestron SLT 130 (130 mm aperture / 650 mm FL Newtonian on a GoTo AltAz mount), because I thought the bigger aperture and shorter focal length would make finding some sort of target easier than trying to use my 90 mm Mak. I had already worked out in daylight hours that the Newt would reach focus on the sensor quite easily by taking the eyepiece adapter out of the focuser, and screwing the camera body straight onto the M42 T2 thread at the top of the focuser. (That's a great design feature by ZWO - providing the camera body with an integral T2 thread in the camera body AND providing a standard 1 1/2" eyepiece adapter!)

I set up and aligned the telescope, pointed it at the brightest star in the southern sky, took out the eyepiece adapter, and screwed on the camera, and wound the focuser to roughly the position where I knew focus could be found.

Then I plugged the camera into my Toshiba Encore Windows 8.1 tablet, started FireCapture , and was gob-smacked to see a slightly out-of-focus star image straight away. Wow! Surely it can't be that easy?! I focused to get the sharpest image I could, and fired a few frames - Yep!  I was clearly getting recognisable star shots, including a few background stars I hadn't noticed by eye.

I then slewed the telescoped to an old favourite - the 47 Tucanae globular cluster.

I had to manually adjust the telescope alignment a bit to get it centred, but once it was in frame, the SLT's tracking kept it nicely on the sensor. I then fired off a few short videos and BMP series using FireCapture, experimenting with different exposure settings. For each series of shots with new settings, I tried resetting FireCapture's automatic Dark Frame function and taking a new dark frame, to compensate for the changed exposure, gain,  sensor temperature, etc.

I then retired indoors to have a look at what I had caught, and what I could extract with stacking frames using AutoStakkert etc.

And here's what I found:

Some of my AVI videos don't seem to contain any useful data - specifically, any I took with frames with more than 1-second exposures. I'll have to do a bit more digging to see if this is a fundamental restriction with using AVI format captures, or just the settings I was using (or simple "user error"!)

However, the AVI videos with sub-1.0-second exposures seem to be quite usable. I still need to learn a lot about getting the best exposures, but I was pretty chuffed as a first effort! Here's a sample which is 71-seconds duration, at 1280x960 resolution, with 1.00 second shutter-speed and Gain set to 100:

(Hint: You probably don't need to watch the whole 70 seconds - there isn't much in the way of plot surprises or or character development!)

AutoStakkert is super-easy to use! Whether this simplicity limits its capability, I'm not sure, but I think I'll continue to "cut my teeth" on AutoStakkert before going back to RegiStax . Here's a quick shot made from the same video, using the best 50% of frames (straight from AutoStakkert with default settings; no other post-processing):

Again, I have a lot to learn, but there's no mistaking it - that's 47 Tuc alright!

Then I thought I'd try some much longer exposures, so I set it up to take a series of BMPs with 60 second exposures - here's a sample (again with Gain set to 100):

The image is straight off the camera, with the same Field of View as the previous AVI - no retouching or post-processing.

At first I was puzzled as to why the BMP seems to be zoomed in so much compared to the AVI and stack, but the more I think about it, I think it's really that the 60 second exposure captures so many more faint stars than a series of 1-second exposures (well, DUH!), so they're showing pretty much the same Field of View, but the AVI only captures the "hot core" of the cluster, while the 60-second frame captures much more of the full structure. I'll try again soon with a series of intermediate exposures - say 10-second, 20-, 30- and so on, and I'll expect to see the cluster "grow" as the exposure time increases.

I've also learnt a lot about my limitations, and the limitations of my equipment; e.g. there are clear signs of telescope vibration and "Field Rotation" on the 60-second shot, so 10- to 20-second exposures might be more sensible. It's also pretty obvious that even though I took a 60-second "dark", there's still quite a bit of sensor noise. (Stay tuned for my upcoming experiment with camera sensor cooling using a Peltier TEC cooler!)

And of course, the old mantra of astro-photography: 
Focus! Focus! Focus!
These shots were all focused by eye on my little 8" tablet screen; next time out, I will try for better focus using my Bahtinov Focussing Mask .

But overall - I'm pretty happy for my first effort!

Saturday, 13 September 2014

ZWO ASI120MC Planetary Camera - A quick review

I've been looking around for an affordable telescope camera that can do some basic Deep Sky imaging,  as well as the usual lunar and planetary work.

I have a Pentax DSLR,  but it maxes out at 30 second time exposure,  and the picture gets very "noisy"  if you push it past about ISO 1600, so it is only capable of capturing the very brightest DSOs.  Added  to that,  it doesn't have any video or "live view"  mode,  and the back screen can only be used for reviewing shots after they are taken,  it doesn't work as a viewfinder.  (Have you ever tried to compose a night-sky view and check focus on a star through the optical viewfinder of a DSLR body which is mounted on your telescope? It ain't easy!)

I also have a Future Optics 3 Mp TVV3000 digital telescope camera: This works fine for its intended use (terrestrial and planetary imaging),  but it only has "typical"  webcam sensitivity,  and has no long exposure capability,  so DSO work is pretty much ruled out.

The ZWO range of CMOS telescope cameras has been getting some pretty good reviews recently,  and the price seems almost too good to be true. These cameras use the cheaper CMOS "webcam" sensor technology as seen in planetary cameras,  rather than the more expensive CCD sensors usually seen on Deep Sky cameras,  which explains their lower price,  but they have the sensitivity and long time exposure capability to also be used for basic deep sky work.

I opted for the 1.2 Mp colour ASI120MC camera -  key specs for this camera are:

Sensor: 1/3" CMOS AR0130CS
Resolution: 1.2Mega Pixels 1280x960
Pixel Size: 3.75µm
Exposure Rage: 64µs-1000s (That's 1,000 seconds,  or more than ten minutes - more than adequate for my humble telescopes!)

A really nice feature is the solid anodised aluminium body (red for this model -  MUCH nicer than the standard plastic body you normally get with a low price camera!), which is 2" outside diameter (to fit straight into a 2" focuser),  with a standard M42 T2 thread on the inside to screw onto common camera adapters.  And of course,  it also has a 1 1/2" eyepiece adapter -  you shouldn't have any trouble fitting this to your optical train!

Something which really sets it apart from the competition is that it also ships with a 150° super-wide-angle lens for doing "all-sky"  imaging,  without using your telescope -  brilliant for capturing meteors or satellite fly-overs! The wide-angle lens screws into an adapter which fits into the T2 thread,  so I imagine you could fit other CCTV camera lenses if you want. The back of the camera body has a standard camera thread,  so you can mount the camera straight onto a tripod for use with a lens fitted -  a nice touch!

And one more thing (as Steve Jobs used to say)  - it also has a built-in auto-guider port,  so it can also be used for auto-guiding as well as imaging.

The asking price is US$279 (+ US$20 for express delivery) - I don't know of any other camera that comes close in performance and features for that sort of money.  I ordered it direct from  the Chinese factory last Saturday, and received it in Brisbane Australia yesterday (Friday) - 6 days from order to delivery, a really excellent delivery service!

I unpacked it, plugged it in, and turned it on - and it worked perfectly, straight out of the box! (The wide angle lens comes pre-installed,  so the first thing I saw was myself,  and the ceiling of the room where I was sitting.) I have tried it on two computers - an older Dell Windows 7 laptop,  and a new Toshiba Encore 8" Windows 8 tablet -  and it works perfectly with both.

The supplied software is excellent - the Windows drivers installed without incident,  and the recommended FireCapture imaging software and AutoStakkert stacking software are both powerful and easy to use.  (I've used RegiStax previously,  but AutoStakkert seems to me to be much simpler and more intuitive,  and gives excellent results with this camera.) The camera seems to be recognised as a standard Windows device,  so it will probably work with any other software of your choice,  but I'll stick with FireCapture and AutoStakkert for now.

After a bit of playing indoors to check out the functionality and the software, I took it outside, and was immediately getting better video and images than I have managed to date with my other equipment.

For my first night-time capture,  I set up the camera with the wide angle lens looking straight up from a tripod,  and got some all-day videos.  While I still have to learn a bit about optimal exposure settings,  I'm pretty pleased with the results I was getting within 5 minutes of taking it outside!

I then attached it to my 90 mm Mak,  and grabbed a few quick star shots - nothing to compare with the Hubble Space Telescope,  but still very gratifying to me,  and much better than anything I've managed before.

It's not often that things work so easily, and so well. This camera is a superb product, and unbelievable value for the selling price. It really does do everything that is claimed.

I'm going to have a lot of fun with this! (Stay tuned for more images and videos.)

Wednesday, 10 September 2014

The new bigger iPhone 6 (Warning: may contain traces of satire)

Wow! This is ground-breaking stuff! It's like discovering that the laws of thermodynamics no longer apply, or that E is NOT equal to mc^2!

In a world-first for mobile technology, Apple engineers have managed to package a screen larger than 4" into a handheld device which promises reasonable battery life, without sacrificing features or performance.

All very clever you say - but what's the point? After all, as so clearly stated on numerous occasions by Apple's marketing gurus, it's a well known fact that the human hand could not manage to hold or operate such a behemoth, and the human eye cannot take in so much visual information when presented at a normal hand-held viewing distance.  Well, Apple's ergonomists believe that 21st Century humans have evolved new traits in response to our immersive information- rich environment that may enable a select few to deal with such a device.

But surely there would be no point in actually manufacturing and marketing a niche device with such limited appeal? Well, Apple has decided to give it a shot, with a new product called the iPhone 6 - and let's face it, if anyone is going to take such giant strides into the unknown, it can only be a company with the huge financial resources and reputation for innovation such as Apple - no other company would have the technical prowess or financial resources for such a brave move.

IT watchers wait with bated breath to see if this bold move will make or break Apple.

In late breaking news:

It seems those copycats at Android have done it again, managing to release a number of cheap copies,  with a plethora of 4.5" to 5.5" (and bigger) models from multiple manufacturers,  all flagrantly copied from Apple's groundbreaking work,  before the iPhone 6 is actually released. Time for Apple to call the patent lawyers ...

Friday, 29 August 2014

Google Cardboard from Chinavasion - Unboxing

As a follow-up to my earlier post: 

I just got my Google Cardboard kit from Chinavasion – not only is the kit complete with all lenses, magnet and washer, NFC Tag, Velcros, etc, but it came fully pre-assembled with the lenses and other doo-dads already installed – you just need to fold it up and drop the phone in.


About 1 minute later:

The NFC tag appears to be un-programmed, but that's easily fixed with a free NFC-Writer app such as "NFC Writer by Tagstand" - just program the NFC Tag to launch "cardboard://v1.0.0" (without the quotes) and it should launch Cardboard app.

The lenses are fine, and it works a treat with my Nexus 4!

Wednesday, 20 August 2014

Quick Review: Pentax XCF 10x50 Binoculars

I've been using a cheap no-brand pair of 10x50 binoculars for some time - both for general daytime terrestrial viewing, and especially for night-time star-gazing use. They're OK (well, actually, they're pretty rubbish!), but I really wanted an affordable pair of reasonable quality 10x50 binoculars. 

Hunting around on the internet, Pentax XCF binoculars seemed to come up over and over, with pretty good reviews. They're listed on many generic discount seller sites, but they're also carried by many more "reputable" optical specialists such as BinTel who are offering them for AU$139. You can get them MUCH cheaper from US retailers, so I dived in and bought myself a pair of 10x50s on eBay, and I have to say I'm absolutely delighted. (They're also available in 8x40, 12x50 and 16x50, but I figured 10x50 was ideal for my needs.)

Warning: Don't confuse the Pentax XCF binoculars with the very common "Pentax Whitetails Unlimited" binoculars that you'll find all over the internet - reviews of the Whitetails suggest that while they may be made in Pentax factories, the Pentax name appears nowhere on the binoculars or packaging, so while they may well be perfectly acceptable for the price, presumably the quality is not in the same league as the branded Pentax XCFs.

The XCFs only cost about 30% more than no-brand 10x50s, but the build-quality and optical quality compared to my previous pair is chalk and cheese! The XCFs are so much brighter and sharper, and also have a much wider field of view (6.5 degrees actual / 65 degrees apparent eyepiece field of view compared to about 4.5 degrees actual / 45 degrees apparent for my old pair). The old binoculars feel like I am looking though a cardboard tube in comparison.

The coatings, lenses and prisms are clearly (pun intended!) far superior to my old binoculars, and it shows in the image quality. Everything is pin-sharp, right across the field of view, and the difference for star-gazing in particular is almost startling - they reveal a significantly wider expanse of night sky, and show much fainter stars and nebulae against the background. They are nicely weighted and balanced, and feel very good in the hand.

I would definitely buy the XCFs again, and I am happy to recommend them to others looking for good quality budget-priced binoculars - they are a great value buy!

Full specifications from the manufacturer's website!product-specs :

The PENTAX XCF series combines outstanding optical performance with exceptional value. Ruggedly styled and providing excellent viewing comfort, the PENTAX XCF series binoculars are as easy to operate as they are to afford. High-quality BaK4 prisms and multi-coated optical elements ensure excellent image quality and light transmission. Soft but durable rubber eyepiece rings can be folded back for the convenience of eyeglass wearers. And a centrally-located, extra large focus wheel affords fast and accurate focusing. Sporting fashionable, black-finish bodies encased in full-body rubber housing, the PENTAX XCF series is ideal for almost any application from casual viewing to serious observation. Available in four different magnifications.

Focusing Range: 30 ft. - infinity
Prism: Porro
Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm
Specifications: 10X
Apparent Field Of View: 65 degrees
Real Field Of View: 6.5 degrees
Field Of View At 1000m: 114m
Coating: Super-multi-coating
Binocular Type: Porro prism, center focusing